How valuators assess the rising risk of fraud
The current economic downturn has produced an upswing in incidents of occupational fraud, so it’s imperative for businesses to step up efforts to deter and detect it. An important part of the valuation process is identifying potential risks and gauging whether management has taken appropriate action to mitigate those risks. This article explains how valuators evaluate internal controls and corporate culture, tailoring their analyses of fraud risks based on the subject company’s size, complexity, industry and goals. The article has an accompanying pie graph chart that shows business fraud scheme type and prevalence over the past few years. 

Avoid M&A pitfalls with targeted due diligence
Anyone buying, selling or merging with a business needs to “kick the tires” before signing on the dotted line. This article explains that a financial professional can conduct due diligence procedures that target high-risk areas for any industry. The article lists seller — and buyer — M&A concerns. It also notes that do-it-yourself M&As can lead to disastrous outcomes and unexpected surprises, pointing out that engaging financial and legal professionals early in the process can save money and stress over the long run.

Finding the appropriate valuation standard
Valuation isn’t static and can change depending on the purpose of the valuation. This article looks at the three most common standards of value: fair market, investment and fair. It briefly defines each standard and discusses the circumstances in which one standard may be more appropriate than another. The article points out that identifying the appropriate valuation standard up front can minimize confusion down the road. The goal is to arrive at a reasonable and supportable value conclusion in light of all the surrounding facts and circumstances.

Shortcuts can be embarrassing — and costly
This brief article warns that novice valuators who sidestep valuation procedures to save money — as well as clients who misrepresent the facts to skew valuation results — may be in for a rude awakening. Courts are becoming increasingly sophisticated in appraisal matters. When a valuator skips steps or fails to understand a company’s operations, the court is likely to discount — or even reject — the expert’s opinion. The article uses the recent case Burr v. Burr to illustrate this point. Case citation: Burr v. Burr (2008 WL 4906271, Mass. App. Nov. 18, 2008).